Rich Lafferty's LiveJournal (mendel) wrote,
Rich Lafferty's LiveJournal
mendel

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Choosing RBLs

Antispam-type people, I want your opinions on RBLs. I've given up on Bayesian filtering companywide, and content-only filtering just doesn't cut it anymore, but I want to avoid putting RBL blocking or tagging in place that I'm going to regret.

Basically I'm after low false positives and negatives, with an emphasis on low false positives for the blocking ones and a balance between both errors on the tagging ones; it's also critical that all of the BLs are based on mechanical or fixed criteria (and not on opinions).

The mailserver in question is the corporate mailhub; any mail coming into the company comes in through there, so the variety of content is pretty wide. Load is about 8-10k messages per hour, about 15% of which are deliverable.

The plan is:

  • Disable Bayesian filtering outright
  • Block outright on sbl-xml.spamhaus.org, bl.spamcop.net, list.dsbl.net, spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
  • Give big spamassassin penalty to dnsbl.sorbs.net, dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org, maybe njabl.net
  • Handle the DNS bits via zone transfers wherever possible, instead of individual requests

Thoughts on those RBLs, or on moving from primarily content/bayes to primarily RBL-based spam handling?

Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments